BUY-ESSAYS-ONLINE-CHEAP

Project 4 Security Plan and Memo

BUY ready-to-submit essays - 100% undetectable and plagiarism-free guaranteed!

Note: All our papers are written by real people, not generated by AI. They pass Turnitin, SafeAssign, and LopesWrite

Security Plan and Memo

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your essay and we will find the best writer for your paper. Thousands of students improved their grades with us.

Write My Essay For Me

Rubric Name: Project 4: Security Plan and Memo

Recommendation Memo Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1
Introduce and Summarize Plan 10 points

Clearly introduces and summarizes the security plan. 8 points

Basically introduces and summarizes the security plan. 6 points

Weakly introduces and summarizes the security plan. 3 points

Little introduction or summary of the security plan. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.) 0 points

Doesn’t introduce or summarize the security plan.
Format, Grammar and Punctuation (Memo) 5 points

MS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. No grammar, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. 4 points

MS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. Less than 3 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. 2 points

MS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. Less than 6 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. 1 point

MS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. Less than 9 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.) 0 points

Non-MS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. More than 9 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
Security Strategy Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1
Describes Strategy 13 points

Clearly describes the security strategy being proposed. Strategy covers the confidentiality, integrity and availability. 10 points

Basically describes the security strategy that is being proposed. Strategy covers most of the following: confidentiality, integrity and availability. 7 points

Weakly describes the security strategy that is being proposed. Strategy covers some of the following: confidentiality, integrity and availability. 3 points

Little description of security strategy that is being proposed. Strategy may cover a few of the following: confidentiality, integrity and availability. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.) 0 points

No description of security strategy solutions. Doesn’t address any of the following: confidentiality, integrity or availability.
Link Solutions 13 points

Clearly describes the linkage between each technology and the strategy. 10 points

Basically describes the linkage between each technology and the strategy. 7 points

Weakly describes the linkage between each technology and the strategy. 3 points

Little description of the linkage between each technology and the strategy. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.) 0 points

No description of any linkage between each technology and the strategy.
Network Diagram 13 points

Clear, detailed network diagram that describes how the technology fits within the infrastructure. 10 points

Basic network diagram with some details that describes how the technology fits within the infrastructure. 7 points

Network diagram with weak details that describes how the technology fits within the infrastructure. 3 points

Network diagram with little or no details that describes how the technology fits within the infrastructure. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.) 0 points

Missing or no network diagram.
Security Technologies Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1
Describes Technologies 13 points

Clearly describes the technologies being proposed. Describe at least three (3) technologies. 10 points

Basically describes the technologies being proposed. Describe at least two (2) technologies. 7 points

Weakly describes the technologies being proposed. Describe at least one (1) technology. 3 points

Little description of technologies being proposed. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.) 0 points

Doesn’t describe the technologies being proposed.
Costs, ROI, Mitigation and Barriers 13 points

Clear and detailed description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed. 10 points

Basic, but detailed description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed. 7 points

Weak and poorly detailed description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed. 3 points

Little detailed description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.) 0 points

No sufficient details in the description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed.
Finds and Applies Knowledge Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1
Use of Authoritative Sources 5 points

Used at least 5 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. One must be NIST SP 800-53. No APA style errors in sources. 4 points

Used at least 3 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. One must be NIST SP 800-53. No more than 1 APA errors in sources. 2 points

Used at least 2 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. One must be NIST SP 800-53. No more than 2 APA errors in sources. 1 point

May have used 1 authoritative or scholarly source in paper. May use NIST SP 800-53. May not have used APA style formatting. 0 points

No authoritative or scholarly sources used in paper. NIST SP 800-53 not mentioned.
Citation of Sources 5 points

All sources cited. No errors in citing material in paper. 4 points

All but 1 source cited. Had no more than 5 citing errors in paper. 2 points

All but 2 sources cited. Had no more than 10 citing errors in paper. 1 point

All but 3 sources cited. Had less than 15 APA citing errors in paper. 0 points

No sources cited or had more than 15 APA citing errors in paper.
Organization, Execution and Appearance Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1
Formatting 5 points

Prepared MS Word document, used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count. 4 points

MS Word document didn’t follow up to two (2) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count. 2 points

MS Word document didn’t follow up to four (4) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count. 1 point

MS Word document followed only one (1) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count. 0 points

Non MS Word document didn’t any of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count.
Grammar and Punctuation 5 points

No grammar, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. 4 points

Less than 5 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. 2 points

Less than 10 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. 1 point

Less than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. 0 points

More than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
Overall Score Level 5
14 or more Level 4
11 or more Level 3
8 or more Level 2
5 or more Level 1
0 or more